Great ! The documentation has been updated to avoid misleading. http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/find#expr
On May 27, 7:59 am, Daniel Friesen <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, .andSelf() exists specifically for the case where someone wants > .find() to also include the previous selection. > > ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] > > Erik Beeson wrote: > > I believe that's expected behavior. For your second example, I think > > you'd want to use filter(...) instead of find(...). > > > --Erik > > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:38 PM, yodza <yodza.fr > > <http://yodza.fr>@gmail.com <http://gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Is it the normal behavior of the find() method to search the passed > > expression ONLY within child nodes of a wrapped set ? > > (which is not explicitly specified in the documentation: > > http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/find#expr) > > > <ol> > > <li id="one">One</li> > > <li id="two">Two</li> > > <li id="three">Three</li> > > </ol> > > > >>> $('ol').find('[id^=t]') // retrieving id="t*" > > [li#two, li#three] > > >>> $('li').find('[id^=t]') // retrieving id="t*" > > [ ] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
