Working or not, having public API methods rely on the context-property doesn't seem like a great idea - is that the case anywhere else?
Jörn On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:32 PM, mike.helgeson<mike.helge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That makes a lot of sense, except it does not work. The "context" > property of the jquery instance is always equal to the first element > when passing in DOM nodes. Unless I am mistaken. > > On Jul 22, 4:33 pm, Brandon Aaron <brandon.aa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think it should just stop at the "context" of the jQuery object. So >> you'd do this instead: >> >> $("table").bind("click", function( event ) { >> var $td = $(event.target, this).closest("td"); >> >> }); >> >> -- >> Brandon Aaron >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:07 PM, mike.helgeson<mike.helge...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I propose adding a second argument to the "closest" method that will >> > act as the end point for searching up the document tree. It can behave >> > just like the "context" argument in the jQuery mother function. It >> > will optimize the performance of a common pattern I have seen in my >> > own code since the addition o this method. >> >> > $("table").bind("click",function( event ){ >> > var $td = $( event.target ).closest("td", this ); >> > }); >> >> > Because I bound the handler to "table" I do not want to search an >> > higher than that element for selector matches. Furthermore, if there >> > was a selector match outside of the containing element, it could >> > potentially and accidentally be matched. >> >> >http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4945 >> >> > Any thoughts? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---