Just a quick note about it: It is designed to be as specific as possible and works with sibling elements. I just looked at the code and found a couple of unused variables and some parts that could be optimized a bit, but overall, it's pretty fast. I uploaded it on Friday in a bit of a hurry (I was leaving work). In the while loop, I use jQuery.fn.parent() instead of el.parentNode because if the element hasn't been added to the DOM yet, .parentNode won't work, but .parent() will. Some detection of whether the element is in the DOM yet had to be done too because jQuery will add an extra parent div to anything html/elements that is passed through the jQuery() function.
I've also written a bunch of unit tests for it and so far so good. Lemme know if you guys find it useful. -- T On Aug 2, 10:18 pm, tres <treshug...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wrote a plugin for it. > > http://code.google.com/p/jquery-plugin-dev/source/browse/trunk/jquery... > > On Aug 2, 6:44 am, George <george.jqu...@softwareunity.com> wrote: > > > > > Yep, that first solution works well. I've used something similar on a > > recent project. > > (If performance is critical then as well as tweaking the while loop > > I'd be inclined to use .length instead of .size() and to ditch > > the .toLowerCase() method.) > > > George > > > On Jul 31, 2:34 pm, Julian Aubourg <aubourg.jul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The issue with simple code like this are siblings. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
