I wrote that one ;)
On Aug 6, 2:58 pm, Daniel Friesen <nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There was another discussion on the mailing list about a plugin
> authoring plugin. It actually allowed plugins that did things like
> $(...).plugin().myPluginFunction().myOtherPluginFunctionWhichReturnsJQ().fi
> nd(...);
>
> ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
>
>
>
> tres wrote:
> > I think if plugin developers were to start utilizing a prototypal
> > inheritance, it would make the most sense to put it into the core.
> > This doesn't mean the current way of extending jQuery needs to change,
> > this just adds to it and makes an api much easier to write, understand
> > and use. As a plugin developer who has written many plugins (not
> > necessarily released) I have found it very, very frustrating to write
> > a plugin with more than 1 function in jQuery. I don't want to pass
> > 'this' as a parameter, nor do I want to use the .dialog('open')
> > method. The former isn't the jQuery way and the latter just seems
> > dirty.
>
> > On Aug 6, 1:14 pm, aHeckman <aaron.heckm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I too believe prototypal inheritance should be left out.
>
> >> But, in general, I'd love to see a change like this in jquery.ui ...
>
> >> On Aug 5, 10:36 pm, tres <treshug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> // would now allow
> >>> $('div').dialog().open();
>
> >>> // instead of
> >>> $('div').dialog('open');
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
