Umm, dunno if you guys read my posts above, but you might want to.
On Aug 12, 8:51 am, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Or better, demonstrate that the constructor will not simply be the one > associated with the proto object in my function or try to retrieve that > function in whatever way you want. > > After that, have a look here:http://www.3site.eu/doc/ > > Regards > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < > > > > andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > David, read carefully, think, and try again .... > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM, David Flanagan > > <da...@davidflanagan.com>wrote: > > >> Of course, if you optimize it in this way to share a single constructor > >> function, you can't find the prototype of an object created with beget() > >> with o.constructor.prototype. Not sure how important that is, but there > >> is a downside to the optimization. > > >> David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
