True, but jQuery needs at least a "standard" version that Google can put on it CDN to please most developers. It seems that these days developers need ajax and effects. And cookies? not so much...
On Aug 21, 12:54 am, Daniel Friesen <nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > And I've worked on projects that don't need ajax or fx. > I think this falls under the category of wanting a buildable jQuery > where you can disable things you don't need, and enable extra features > that you might want. > > ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] > > lrbabe wrote: > > Hello Miksh, > > > Most of my projects do not make use of any cookies. > > It is just perfect as a plugin. > > > On Aug 20, 3:07 pm, miksh <msha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> Cookie is a common and widely used functionality so it is deserved to > >> be added into jQuery.Utilities rather than to be just a plug-in. > > >> Thanks > >> Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
