Fair enough. I guess I considered them one in the same. On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:23 PM, lrbabe <lrb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > jQuery and $, actually. > > On Aug 28, 6:49 pm, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > jQuery "give's a hoot" and doesn't pollute (anyone remember Woodsy the > Owl?) > > The only var that jQuery ever exposes to the window is... "jQuery" > > > > Rick > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < > > > > andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > also is auto-reflective DOMOD approach sounds cool :D > > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:18 PM, lrbabe <lrb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> DOM Oriented Development sounds nice, looks like the "find things, do > > >> stuff" alternative for research papers. > > > > >> On Aug 28, 3:17 pm, Nathan Bubna <nbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > DOM Oriented Development, all about nodes, data and events. > > > > >> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Buddy<buddywilli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > >> > > What would you call jQuery's design pattern / principals? > > > > >> > > - Closures > > >> > > - OO > > >> > > - etc. > > > > >> > > Everything is helpful. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
