To be honest, I am not a big fun of conditional comments but it does not
matter, as long as this simple function will be quickly optimized :-)
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:02 AM, DBJDBJ <dbj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ditto :
>
> inArray : function( elem, array ) {
> return array.indexOf( elem );
> } ,
> /*...@cc_on
> inArray : function( elem, array ) {
> for ( var i = 0, length = array.length; i < length; i++ )
> {
> if ( array[ i ] === elem ) {
> return i;
> }
> }
> return -1;
> } ,
> @*/
>
> Nice, clear and simple ... Same as my (?) old proposal for optimising
> the internal function xhr() :
>
> xhr: function() {
> return new XMLHttpRequest();
> },
> /*...@cc_on
> xhr: function() {
> return new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP") ;
> },
> @*/
>
>
> @Andrea: I would love to read you angle on this? Maybe there is
> something so wrong and so obviuos in here, so that is very difficult
> to spot ?
>
> --DBJ
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
