Well I had a thought. It might be a bad thing to add extra code into
JQuery simply to check if the developer has been stupid. It'd be
better to have a plug in that developers can add and temporarily use.
I'm working on such an proof of concept plug in, so I'll post here
again with the example.
On Sep 4, 1:56 pm, Dave Methvin <dave.meth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "$(true).html()" - Throws a TypeError with the information 'this
> > [0].innerHTML is undefined
> > Source File: query-1.3.2.min.js Line: 12'
>
> Whenever you're debugging, use the non-minimized version of jQuery.
> Both Firefox and IE8 have very good debuggers, so when an error like
> this occurs in the guts of jQuery you can look at the stack trace to
> see how it got there from your own code or plugins.
>
> > "$("p").html(true)" - Reduces the HTML of all <P> elements to nothing.
> > It can be passed objects too, and the same behaviour is observed.
>
> That's the "Garbage in, garbage out" problem, which is hard to solve
> in general. It might be inexpensive for jQuery to stringify the args
> in this case, so that instead of nothing you'd get the string "true"
> or "[object Object]" in the paragraphs for bogus inputs. At least that
> would be a bit less mysterious to debug.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
