On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:19 PM, John Snyders<jjsnyd...@rcn.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 7, 6:24 pm, Nathan Bubna <nbu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:08 PM, John Snyders<jjsnyd...@rcn.com> wrote: >> >> > I would like to add my opinion. >> ... >> > I do not think individual callbacks for each status code are a good >> > idea. >> >> Why? > > In my apps the processing done for different status codes is mostly > common. > So it would be easier for me to just add a little branching as needed. > > But if I understand what is proposed the status code handler functions > are optional and only > called if defined. You can still use success and error if you like. So > they wouldn't get in my way - it > just doesn't seem worth it to me.
yeah, i definitely do NOT advocate getting rid of the success and error buckets for status code. the per-statusCode callbacks would be totally optional for those to whom it is very worth it, like me! :) > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
