I actually already started to work on an implementation using focusin and focusout, I'll see what kind of results I'm able to get. It's a kind of "lazy binding" approach.
On Sep 20, 10:51 pm, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oooh, ok - so I re-read the code and I think I understand it now. > Interesting that they use activate/deactivate instead of focusin/focusout > (which is what we use right now). That seems to be the secret sauce. The > browser detection code is sloppy and the fact that a handler is bound to > body regardless of it the events are looked for is lame - either way I think > we may be able to make use of this technique. > > --John > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:26 AM, lrbabe <lrb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The principle of Reglib is to always work for existing and future > > elements. > > Those events rely on a bubbling implementation of focus, something > > that we already have in trunk and works pretty well. > > > On Sep 20, 4:20 pm, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Doesn't that run contrary to the idea behind the live method? In that you > > > can bind an event to any element that currently exists and will exist? > > This > > > is really a non-solution, unfortunately. > > > > --John > > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:43 AM, lrbabe <lrb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > I know that before releasing jQuery 1.4 it is expected that all events > > > > should be compatible with .live() > > > > I had a look at the patch related to submit, proposed by Justin Meyer: > > > >http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5267 > > > > and I am afraid by the possibility that all of these events could > > > > require such a complex implementation. > > > > > I would just like to draw your attention toward the choice made by > > > > Greg Reimer in Reglib: > > > >http://code.google.com/p/reglib/source/browse/trunk/reg.js#1115 > > > > > He actually binds "delegated" event handlers to an individual form > > > > element when it receives focus, since (according to him) this event is > > > > guaranteed to happen first. > > > > It might not be a better solution (I'm not sure there is a perfect > > > > solution unfortunately) but it might be cleaner. > > > > > What do you think about it? > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Louis-Rémi Babé --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
