Actually I think that the position relative bug was in older versions of IE.
On Sep 28, 12:56 pm, aHeckman <aaron.heckm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm using an X-UA-Compatible: IE=8 header and can use all fade methods > with no problems. document.documentMode returns "8". Is the element > positioned "relative"? > > On Sep 27, 6:19 pm, Ricardo Tomasi <ricardob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If I recall correctly IE8 in strict mode doesn't support the filter: > > alpha(opacity=00); syntax, which jQuery uses to set opacity. It needs - > > ms-filter: “progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(Opacity=0)”; > > instead. > > > On Sep 23, 4:08 am, Mad-Halfling <mad-halfl...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, I originally posted this in the general discussion, but it is > > > probably more appropriate here. > > > > Are there problems with the animation with IE8 compatibility mode > > > forced off? > > > I am using meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=EmulateIE8" > > > to force IE 8 out of compatibility mode for my site, as I need to use > > > the new CSS support that IE 8 finally properly implements (it's an > > > internal site, so I'm not worried about any other browsers), but I > > > notice that in doing that the fadeIn (and Out) no longer seems to work > > > - the content the method is being applied to just sits there for the > > > fade duration and then disappears. This isn't a great hardship, but > > > it would be nice to be able to showcase what jQuery can do and these > > > effects would add a bit more wow-factor to the site. > > > > Thx > > > > MH --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---