On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:37 AM, gMinuses <gminu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If your argument is scoping, it is not enough. > > I don't quite understand what your are saying, could you be more > specific?
The main point, I think, is that you have not convinced either of us of the worth of your proposed extension. Can you describe some real-world scenario that's fairly difficult to do now that would be much easier with an extended $.map? If you can, then there's room for discussion about the benefits of the extension versus the costs of adding to core and of the technical difficulties that might be involved. Maybe I'm just being dense, but I'm not really seeing the benefits. $.map to me is a technique to convert one sequence of like items into another sequence of like items (that might be entirely unlike the original ones). For instance, I might use it to extract the ids of a sequence of nodes. I don't see how I would want to use it for an arbitrary object. -- Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
