Like I said... "It doesn't make a difference to me if my one line gets to
ride with 1.4 or not"

While I respect and practice unit testing myself, I have never thought of it
as "future proofing".



On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Clifford Heath <clifford.he...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 24/12/2009, at 11:19 AM, Rick Waldron wrote:
> > As for my not providing unit test cases, I can simply reply: 9
> > months real world usage in every application that I've written with
> > jquery have proven, to me, that it works.
>
> Unit tests aren't about proving that a thing works.
> They're about making sure it continues to work
> into the future.
>
> Clifford Heath.
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jQuery Development" group.
> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.


Reply via email to