I made a post about how confusing people may find the name bind some time ago. Suggested renaming bind to something like event, and keeping bind as an alias of course. That was rejected.
I don't get what you are talking about a fn.bind() implementation in jQuery, or what you mean by available in just one function though. ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] Rick Waldron wrote: > John, > > While I'm glad to see a scope arg available, i still think this is > negligent to the future of jQuery and ES standards. I really think a > fn.bind() implementation would ideal (since it would be jQuery-wide > and not just available in one function), but as I've noted in the past > and is exampled here, beginners may find this syntax a bit boggling: > > $(foo).bind('event', fn.bind(bar) ); > > Rick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
