Dan G. Switzer, II schrieb:
Jörn,
You can do that already. After implementing the suppurt for expressions,
support for plain functions was really easy. I can imagine adding a
method on the fly:
rules: {
field2: function() { return condition; }
}
I wasn't aware of that. However, if you changed that do:
rules: {
field2: {custom: function() { return condition; }}
}
Then you could do:
messages: {
field2: {custom: "My custom function error!"}
}
Also, just so I'm clear on how it works, what happens with the following:
rules: {
field2: function() { return false; }
}
Does this just throw the field2 is required? What happens if I want to apply
other validation rules to field2?
Sorry, my example was a bit misleading. So far you can't pass a function
as a rule, only as a value to required.
supported: field: { required: function() {} }
not supported: field: function() {}
By adding support for the latter, you could do almost everything, but
I'm not yet sure how it should actually work.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
