Brian, >I would agree to some extent that it is not necessary to detect if >JavaScript is disabled. However, there are an abundance of (I do hate >saying this word) Web 2.0 sites in which it is impossible to use all >the features unless JavaScript is fully functioning. Sometimes it is >nice just to give the user a little message that lets them know they >might be missing something good ;)
I know for a fact what Rick's trying to do, it's totally unnecessary to detect for JS. He's trying to do some very basic client-side validation. -Dan
