Personally i like the relativaly small community that jQuery has, its easier to identfiy people and the mailing list doesnt get thousands of emails per day.
On 5/4/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think he has anything to do with name. Dr. Dobbs is a business-centric programming magazine. They focus completely on .NET and Java. jQuery, generally speaking, doesn't have wide-spread love in corporate environments (it doesn't look like .NET or Java - whereas Dojo and YUI generally do). It's a weird stigma, we probably won't ever pass it, unless we changed out jQuery worked - but that's fine by me - I like where we are now, and the users that we attract (designers, developers, small-medium businesses, a few large businesses). I think it says something about the library itself, concerning who enjoys its code. --John On 5/4/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Vaska, > > > Also, anybody know why the author here did not include Jquery? > > > > http://www.ddj.com/dept/webservices/199203087 > > > > Cheers > > While jQuery is certainly as powerful and feature rich as those > mentioned, it doesn't have the name recognition of a Dojo, YUI or Prototype. > > We're doing our best to get the jQuery name out and by the amount of > traffic we're receiving to the jQuery site, it seems that the word is > spreading. > > Rey... >
