On May 21, 4:22 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >Rey, I'm a little dense here, but not exactly sure what he is trying to say
> >with this line:
>
> > "However, it does not support a reusable programming model like an object
> >oriented approach, so you should not expect thousands of lines of JQuery
> >code to be a good asset to your project"
>
> >can anyone clarify. Is this a compliment or a knock against jquery?
>
> I think they mean it as a knock, but I don't agree with the statement.
>
> While it's true the plug-in architecture isn't a true OO model, you can
> definitely build re-usable logic using the plug-ins.
>
> And there's nothing preventing you to building all your code OO-based and
> using jQuery to interact w/the DOM. In a nutshell, that's what jQuery really
> is--a DOM helper.
>
> -Dan
Hi,
I'm one of the authors of the article.
JQuery is obviously a solid product with a great following.
Here are my apologies for any offense given, no knock was intended.
You've raised some good points here. I'll post a comment on the
article back to this thread.
Regards
Marty Kube
