You and me both on #cakephp - Down with the Prototype lot!

On 6/13/07, Felix Geisendörfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


 I'll tell you another thing. Anytime I get into a conversation on which
 > JS library to use (usually over on CF-Talk, but sometimes other places
 > too), not only do I always recommend jQuery, but I *always* make it a
 > point to take the opportunity to tell folks about the jQuery community,
 > and how awesome it is. I somehow fail to do this : (. I tend to threaten
people if they don't convert to the one true religion of the almighty
jQuery. However folks (/victims) from #cakephp will testify that I've got
quite a good conversion rate regardless : ).

 -- Felix

--------------------------
 http://www.thinkingphp.org
 http://www.fg-webdesign.de


 Christopher Jordan wrote:
 LOL! :o)

 Benjamin Sterling wrote:
Chris, well said, sounds like you need a hug now though :)


On 6/13/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Chris,
>
> You definitely do a stellar job of talking up jQuery and I'm really
> thankful for that. It makes my job as the jQuery Evangelism Lead that
> much easier. I really appreciate your efforts.
>
> As for stats, we currently have 2302 signed up on the list so its a nice
> number of supporters!
>
> Rey...
>
> Christopher Jordan wrote:
> >
> > Just to make a comment on the community for a second. I must say that
> > this is the first web community where I've felt welcome. I don't know if
> > that's because I've been on the list (thanks to you Rey) since before
> > jQuery had a version number, or because I rarely if ever see anyone
> > discouraging anyone else because of their current ability level.
> >
> > I'll tell you another thing. Anytime I get into a conversation on which
> > JS library to use (usually over on CF-Talk, but sometimes other places
> > too), not only do I always recommend jQuery, but I *always* make it a
> > point to take the opportunity to tell folks about the jQuery community,
> > and how awesome it is. Even though we're growing, and are probably quite
> > large (any stats on the number of list subscribers, Rey?) it still feels
> > very tight knit.
> >
> > Anyway, those are my blubbery thoughts... I love you guys, man! *sniff*
;o)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> > Rey Bango wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Tane. We really believe we have the best community out there
> >> and nurturing it is a project priority. Empowering the community is
> >> very important and we want you guys to drive the features as opposed
> >> to us imposing things on you. Hopefully, everyone will bare with us
> >> just a bit while we focus on finishing v1.1.3 and then jump on v1.2.
> >>
> >> Also, if anyone has real concerns about these performance results,
> >> please don't hesitate to ask us about it. We'll be glad to address
> >> them and let you know whether its truly something that you should be
> >> concerned about or if its something that's more along the lines of
> >> FUD. Our core team is as talented as any out there so we do have the
> >> ability to give you answers based on real-world experiences.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Rey
> >>
> >> Tane Piper wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Again, another good thing about the jQuery community - you guys
> >>> actually listen to the community, and our wants and concerns.  A lot
> >>> could be said for other communities ruled with an iron fist, and
> >>> getting nowhere fast.
> >>>
> >>> On 6/13/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> We know that a lot of you have been concerned about the speed test
> >>>> results recently generated by the SlickSpeed Selector Test Suite. We
> >>>> understand your concerns and realize how tests like these can cause
> >>>> misconceptions about real-world performance to those unfamiliar with
> >>>> client-side development. As such, the team is committed to improving
> >>>> selector performance and will begin looking into this after v1.1.3 is
> >>>> officially released. Improvements could come in the form of an
interim
> >>>> release or in jQuery v1.2, depending on the complexities of the
changes
> >>>> and how they tie into the overall core architecture.
> >>>>
> >>>> John Resig, jQuery project team leader, will make a decision as to
how
> >>>> these improvements will be implemented and will also make a formal
blog
> >>>> posting about v1.2 soon after v1.1.3 is out of beta. We will
> >>>> continue to
> >>>> focus on maintaining a small, feature-rich package but will consider
> >>>> increasing jQuery's core size to accommodate improvements.
> >>>>
> >>>> As you know, the jQuery project has one of the most enthusiastic and
> >>>> supportive communities on the Net and its important to ensure that
> >>>> every
> >>>>   jQuery developer feels like the project team is listening to their
> >>>> concerns. We've certainly heard you and will be working to improve
> >>>> selector speeds in the near future.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for all the feedback and support.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rey....
> >>>> jQuery Project Team
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> BrightLight Development, LLC.
> >>>> 954-775-1111 (o)
> >>>> 954-600-2726 (c)
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> http://www.iambright.com
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> BrightLight Development, LLC.
> 954-775-1111 (o)
> 954-600-2726 (c)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.iambright.com
>



 --
 Benjamin Sterling
 http://www.KenzoMedia.com
 http://www.KenzoHosting.com
 --
http://www.cjordan.us



--
Tane Piper
http://webrocket.wordpress.com

This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private

Reply via email to