Jack,
Where are you seeing the speed issues? On page start? The following code
could be sped up a bunch. It's the code that runs on the $().ready() to
initialize all the method. Hard coding the string to an array and getting
rid of the eval() would speed things up.
-Dan
(function() {
var t =
"A<ABBR<ACRONYM<ADDRESS<AREA<B<BASE<BDO<BIG<BLOCKQUOTE<BODY<BR<BUTTON<CAPTIO
N<CITE<CODE<COL<COLGROUP<DD<DEL<DIV<DFN<DL<DT<EM<FIELDSET<FONT<FORM<FRAME<FR
AMESET<H1<H2<H3<H4<H5<H6<HEAD<HR<HTML<I<IFRAME<IMG<INPUT<INS<KBD<LABEL<LEGEN
D<LI<LINK<MAP<META<NOFRAMES<NOSCRIPT<OBJECT<OL<OPTGROUP<OPTION<P<PARAM<PRE<Q
<SAMP<SCRIPT<SELECT<SMALL<SPAN<STRONG<STYLE<SUB<SUP<TABLE<TBODY<TD<TEXTAREA<
TFOOT<TH<THEAD<TITLE<TR<TT<UL<VAR".split("<");
for (var j=0;j<t.length;j++) {
var tl = t[j].toLowerCase();
eval("jQuery."+t[j]+" = function() { return (function (args)
{var attr = args[0]||{};var z = typeof attr == 'string' || typeof attr==
'number' ? 0: 1; var str = '<"+tl+"';"+
//fix readonly input type for IE
(tl=='input' && document.all ? "if (z) for (var j in
attr) if (j.toLowerCase()=='type') { if (attr[j]) str+='
type=\"'+attr[j]+'\"'; break; }":"")+
"str+='/>';var n = jQuery(str); if (z)
n.jQuickAttr(attr,'"+tl+"'); for (var i=z;i<args.length;i++) { var a =
args[i]; if (!a) continue; if (a.constructor != Array) n.jQuickAppend(a);
else for (var k=0;k<a.length;k++) n.jQuickAppend(a[k]); } return
n;})(arguments); }")
}
})();
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Jack Killpatrick
>Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 5:24 PM
>To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
>Subject: [jQuery] jquick speed
>
>
>Earlier today I converted some string concat js stuff (for creating
>HTML) to use the jquick plugin instead:
>
> http://jquick.sullof.com/jquick/
>
>Things now seem noticably slower, but I also changed a bunch of other
>stuff in the code I'm working on. I haven't dug in deeper to see where
>the speed issue might be, but am wondering if anyone has used jquick
>much and can vouch for it's speed (or has noticed it causing bottlenecks)?
>
>Thanks,
>Jack
