Christof: I appreciate your comments. Even more however I would have
appreciated if you'd have taken into consideration why I made the
proposal. I didn't do so because I personally need this functionality,
but because I think both exists() and hasClass() would make the library
more accessible to newcomers who do not understand the inner workings
100% perfectly. Now if you are saying that those should be educated
rather then spoiled then you've got a valid point there. I just think
that jQuery has gained a lot of it's popularity due to it's
easy-to-learn factor (besides it's superiority and beauty that is : )
and think this could be a good addition to it.
> <div class="myClass">...</div>
> <div class="myOtherClass">...</div>
>
> $('div').hasClass('myClass');
>
> What should this return now?
It should return true. That's because $('a').attr('href') returns the
'href' attribute of the first anchor matched (afaik).
-- Felix
--------------------------
My Blog: http://www.thinkingphp.org
My Business: http://www.fg-webdesign.de
Christof Donat wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> However, as you said this library is more then just code, it's art. And
>> this is why I'm emphasizing those new functions: They empower the artist
>>
>
> "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
> there
> is nothing left to take away."
> (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)
>
> Don't try to add paint to the Mona Lisa ;-)
>
> Christof
>
>
