Ah, Just checked your example. We're using the following:

$('div#target').load('/get/a/html/fragment');

which still applies the dom modification, just seperately to the
appendTo.

On Aug 7, 10:57 am, Phillip B Oldham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using both load and $.ajax (via $.post and $.get). It wasn't
> working at all for me with .load. Will test your new code this week
> when I'm back on js development.
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
> On Aug 1, 7:38 pm, "Brandon Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey Phillip,
>
> > Do you have an example of where it isn't working for you? The behavior will
> > work once the information is added to the DOM. I've updated my
> > example/demo/test with an example of using 
> > .load.http://brandonaaron.net/jquery/plugins/behavior/test/test.html
>
> > --
> > Brandon Aaron
>
> > On 8/1/07, Phillip B Oldham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi all
>
> > > Just a quick note - the behavior plugin doesn't work with any method
> > > which fires the $.ajax method - $.load, $.post, $.get, etc. - when
> > > using the latest jQuery (1.3.1.1).
>
> > > Thought I'd mention it as the FAQ is a little miss-leading: <http://
> > > docs.jquery.com/
>
> > > Frequently_Asked_Questions#Why_do_my_events_stop_working_after_an_Ajax_request.
> > > 3F>
>
> > > $('a').behavior('click',fn);
> > > $('#mydiv').load('my.html');
>
> > > The above doesn't work.
>
> > > I modified the test.html file that comes with the plugin to test
> > > the .load method by loading a second html doc with a div to see
> > > whether the links were attached, but had no joy.
>
> > > Reviewing both the plugin and jquery source it seems as though no
> > > triggers are bound to the .ajax method. I'm not sure whether this is
> > > because jquery has been refactored, or something else. I tried using
> > > previous versions (1.1.2, 1.1.1, 1.1) with no luck.
>
> > > Thought I'd let you guys know, so you can amend the FAQ. Or, if you
> > > *have* got it working, you might be able to tell me how and make the
> > > FAQ a little clearer.
>
> > > Thanks!

Reply via email to