Nope. This is part of the upcoming jQuery UI effort. :)
Rey...
Benjamin Sterling wrote:
Rey, that is sweet. I did not see that on the plug in page, nor in a
google search, is that yours?
On 8/22/07, *Rey Bango* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
Does this jQuery plugin not work?
http://uiupload.webunity.nl/
Rey...
Josh Nathanson wrote:
> It is not that shocking to me -- these are some difficult
requirements
> that developers have always struggled with, as far as Javascript
> solutions -- especially numbers 4 and 7. Flash seems to handle
> multi-file uploads a little more easily.
>
> If mootools has been able to overcome these obstacles in pure JS
that is
> very impressive.
>
> Have at it Benjamin!
>
> -- Josh
>
> Wow, it is shocking the none of jQuery file uploaders have those
> ability. That may be something I need to work on. Very
shocking.
>
> I wish I knew how to get around the mootools issue, just never
> worked with it before.
>
> On 8/22/07, *Jack Killpatrick* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> I want to do this and have evaluated and tried a few plain-js
> and jquery based solutions:
>
> http://digitarald.de/playground/uplooad.html
>
> required abilities:
>
> 1. select multiple files at once via browse dialog
> 2. list all selected files separately
> 3. remove any selected file before uploading and during
upload
> (if not started)
> 4. per-item progress bars (and ability for individual
uploads to
> complete before whole batch does)
> 5. clear completed list easily
>
> Nice to haves:
>
> 6. restrict selections by file extension
> 7. file-size limit enforced on client side
>
> Additionally: I'm looking for a solution that has most/all of
> this already packaged (since this mootools uploader does
and has
> therefore set the bar) so that implementation time will
be minimal.
>
> FWIW, all of the jq-based plugins I've looked at so far
did not
> meet *all* requirements or came close, but had various
> browser-specific issues (crashing browsers, not loading from
> local cache) that made us give up on them.
>
> - Jack
>
> Benjamin Sterling wrote:
>> @GTG, great question, I second that.
>>
>> @Jack, if you can explain what you are trying to do with
>> mootools, maybe we can come up with an alternative.
>>
>> On 8/22/07, *Ganeshji Marwaha* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think there is a way to make mootools play well
>> with other libraries when using the infamous "$".
jQuery
>> is probably the only library that understands this
concern
>> and has implemented appropriate precautions in its
code base.
>>
>> That said, to look at ur needs from a higher level, i
>> think i will first need to understand what is that u r
>> doing with mootools that can't be done in jquery. If we
>> are able to easily achieve the same using jQuery,
then you
>> wont have to use mootools at all in the first place...
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Benjamin Sterling
> http://www.KenzoMedia.com <http://www.KenzoMedia.com>
> http://www.KenzoHosting.com
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://www.KenzoMedia.com <http://www.KenzoMedia.com>
http://www.KenzoHosting.com
