What I love is the bullocks (I've been watching too much Gordon Ramsey's "Kitchen Nightmares") these guys have (http://thinslice.net/) have, from their website:
> Crap. The stuff that so many web "experts" hurl at their clients without > mercy. > They promise style, they promise substance. But underneath all the gloss, > they've got nothing. > Well we say it's time to cut the crap. To trim the fat that's weighing down > the > web, with custom applications built to enhance and simplify. So, if including 200KB of JavaScript Libraries on a page that only utilizes ThickBox is considered "trim[ing] the fat", what does a fat website look like? That particular page weighs in at 826KB, not exactly lean by anyone's definition. - jake On Nov 5, 2007 9:09 AM, Andy Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's pretty funny. Whomever designed this site isn't really thinking that > smart. They're using jQuery AND Prototype. Most likely just using jQuery to > be able to use Thickbox. Why not just use Lightbox then and save yourself > the load of jQuery? > > > andy > > > -----Original Message----- > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jake McGraw > Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 1:38 AM > To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com > Subject: [jQuery] SITE SUBMISSION: pvponline.com > > > Online comic, using ThickBox: > > http://www.pvponline.com/book > > - jake > > >
