All these questions have been covered over and over again, please search the group if you REALLY need answers:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/search?group=jquery-en&q=slickspeed&qt_g=Search+this+group As Rey said: I ask that nobody respond to this as this is obvious spam/link bait. On 12/11/07, Jesse Klaasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > These are my (total) results: > > IE7 > Prototype: 2199 ms > Mootools: 1546 ms > jQuery: 1336 ms > > FF2 > Prototype: 326 ms > Mootools: 390 ms > jQuery: 1092 ms > > SAFARI3 > Prototype: 896 ms > Mootools: 279 ms > jQuery: 452 ms > > So, there seem to be big differences between IE, Safari and FF, both in > overall DOM/Javascript speed (FF seems to be a LOT faster) and in the > different libraries. In IE jQuery is the big winner, in FF the big > loser. > > Regards, > Jesse Klaasse. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 3:22 PM > To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com > Subject: [jQuery] Re: Performance of jquery > Importance: Low > > > maybe it depends on your browser and/or pc, it seems fastest when I run > the test... > > -ark > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sharique" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "jQuery (English)" <jquery-en@googlegroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:10 AM > Subject: [jQuery] Performance of jquery > > > | > | Pls have a look at this test. > | http://mootools.net/slickspeed/ > | Performance of JQuery of quite low as compare to other java script > | libraries. > | -- > | Sharique > -- Benjamin Sterling http://www.KenzoMedia.com http://www.KenzoHosting.com http://www.benjaminsterling.com
