Hi Karl, Can you explain what you mean by "active" content. And what you meant by loading in the js and html seperatly? I am not sure how this would be possible with a WYSIWYG editor that is heavy on js. I have an example, but I don't really want to publicly post the URL.
> My advice is don't use AJAX to bring in pages of "active" content, > that is HTML _and_ JavaScript. There's lot's of issues you'll have to > deal with and it's usually easier to load HTML and JavaScript content > in separately. > > Karl Rudd > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:56 AM, hubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am using the jQuery ajax function using GET to load data into a > > div. Part of the page contains a WYSIWYG editor, which contains alot > > of javascript code. When I try to load that page, it starts to load > > it, but then basically refreshes the page, and just sits there and > > tries to load something. > > > So, my question is, what kind of javascript would screw up when loaded > > using ajax, or innerHTML? Are there some known parts of javascript > > that cannot be brought in through ajax? I am just trying to debug > > this, and it is a huge pain.
