As Jörn has stated, we have intentionally gone against the RFC a bit
to go for a more practical approach.  The original regex was written
to the spec (as much as possible).  I seem to recall that while I was
writing the regex I thought it was actually impossible to follow the
spec because I had to reference several RFCs and there were
contradictions.  In fact, even the W3C doesn't recommend following the
spec (the HTML 5 spec gives specific modifications to make for
validation).

In a month or two, I will be writing scripts to produce custom regexes
for IRI and email validation, so that should cover whatever your needs
are.  At the same time I will be updating the regexes in the webforms
plugin, which will follow the HTML 5 rules exactly (they're pretty
close right now - closer than what we use in the validation plugin).

Feel free to contact me directly if you'd like more information on
this.


On Jun 25, 11:11 am, AstroIvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like the default email validation isn't of the correct version.
> My team is going with this as a custom validator, but the validate
> plugin might want to update
>
> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/JavaScript/Best_Practices

Reply via email to