I think you are measuring the combined time. Try this:
var xmltojson_start = new Date().getTime();
ret = $.xmlToJSON(responseXML);
var xmltojson_stop = new Date().getTime();
var template_start = new Date().getTime();
$('#output2').processTemplate(ret);
var template_stop = new Date().getTime();
alert("****************************************"+
"\n\tXml to Json: " + (xmltojson_stop - xmltojson_start) +
"\n\tTemplate Processing: " + (template_stop - template_start) +
"\n********************************************");
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Andiih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jack, I'll take a look
> Chris, I *think* the timing code I've added in my sample above is only
> timing the template step ?
>
> I've had the opportunity to try this out this afternoon on a number of
> machines in the organization, and noted a couple of things...
> Its quick in FF3 (which I didn't expect given what I have been
> reading)
> Its *usually* a lot slower in IE than FF, but some machines are the
> opposite.
>
> So, I need to revise the question : what browser configuration
> changes, plugins, settings etc might make a *huge* difference to inter-
> browser performance ?
>
> I'll see if JavaScriptTemplates looks like I can integrate it, and re-
> test.
>
> TIA
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Jun 26, 6:02 pm, "chris thatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Andiih, just curious becuase I use jtemplates and havent seen that issue,
> > though can you verify that the slow code is not 'xmlToJSON'. I have seen
> > the marshalling process take up a lot of time in IE when the xml is
> > substantial in size .
> >
> > Thatcher
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Jack Killpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know how it compares as far as speed, but you might want to try
> > > this:
> >
> > >http://code.google.com/p/trimpath/wiki/JavaScriptTemplates
> >
> > > We've been using it for more than a year on many of our projects,
> including
> > > some with large table row outputs, and it's worked for us.
> >
> > > - Jack
> >
> > > Andiih wrote:
> >
> > >> I am using jTemplates (jquery-jtemplates.js) to render a large xml
> > >> response by running xmlToJSON then processTemplate. Although the code
> > >> works fine, and performance in FF2.0 is acceptable (2672ms) on my test
> > >> system, I am getting a result of 9827ms when running in IE7. Is there
> > >> a known performance issue with jtemplates ? Are other templte modules
> > >> better ?
> >
> > >> (p.s. the real world code uses jQuery Form plugin and web services,
> > >> but the sample below reproduces the issue)
> >
> > >> Code, and template follow.
> >
> > > ... snip...
> >
> > --
> > Christopher Thatcher
>
--
Christopher Thatcher
