So you're saying that since Jon "thinks" TraceMonkey is better than V8 (despite the actual tests), than it must be? Or am I reading what you wrote wrong?
On Sep 3, 2008, at 2:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear folk , > for more information please check this Article which John Resig > performed > http://ejohn.org/blog/javascript-performance-rundown/ > it says Chrome has been powered by V8 javascript engine , and JOhn > and his partners are working with TraceMonkey > > > and developing it , he believe it is much better than V8 and they > will import TraceMonkey to firefox 3.2 right now in firefox 3.1 > Tracemonkey is BUilt in but it is disabled ... so guys I think we > have to check our websites with CHrome and validate it .... > Regards Pedram > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Guy Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Bil Corry wrote: > > My comment was written in the context of the quote I replied to. > Guy > > Fraser wrote that Chrome was "designed to kill MSIE on corporate > > networks." If that is the case, then the fact that Google will also > > save money from the conversion of Firefox users certainly doesn't > hurt > > either (from Google's perspective). I was subtly suggesting that > > while it may be accidental that Google is saving itself some > revenue, > > it may also be intentional. It'll be interesting to see if Google > > ever offers Chrome-only features or services, which would entice > users > > to switch to Chrome. > > Google have confirmed that they will be working with Mozilla until at > least 2011 - can't remember where I read it but it was announced > recently. > > From google's perspective, any modern browser will serve their needs > IMHO - however, MSIE (including the now "not standard mode by > default on > intranets any more" version 8 *sigh*) MUST die. > > With M$ playing around with unwanted features like web slices, rather > than making a browser that actually works, Google have a strong > incentive to kill off MSIE from the corporate networks (and > remainder of > MSIE on home computers) in any way they can. As an industry, we just > can't move forward (properly) until MSIE is destroyed. > > Guy > > > >
