> 5. the right/left arrows are too discrete and look quirky, a simple > styled arrow without the vertical bar would be more beautiful and > useful > > >> they were actually designed by the customer, and i personally find them > >> quite good looking but it's all amount to taste in the end. and you know, > >> it's just arrows. Once you know they are there, you won' spend much time > >> admiring their beauty.
what I meant to say is that they don't look like arrows, their function is not implicit until you hover and realize it's clickable. > > 7. clicking the category names at the top is a mistery. I guess it > adds (underline) or removes (no underline) categories from the > barcode, but that is far from intuitive and there is no animation, it > just pops a new barcode instantly > > >> it actually filters the barcode, only showing the images related to the > >> keywords underlined. The customer, when encoding an image set, associates > >> one or more of the 5 tags. These keywords enable the visitor to select > >> which images to actually see. note that the current images are just a > >> dummy encoding, so the current associaiton is not relevant, hence your > >> probable confusion? similar to above, I think behaviour is not clear. If you click "Editorial" for example nothing happens, and "advertising" causes unoticeable changes in the barcode. When you have "Professional" and "Experimental" selected, if you click "People" nothing changes also. In those cases one could think that the interface is not working, because there are no visible changes. I assume all sets tagged "People" are also tagged as "Experimental", that could be the issue. > thanks a lot again you're welcome, hope my critics are useful :] - ricardo
