That Does it too!! I still don't get why 'i' keeps always the last value if you don't do var i = j; :S
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Balazs Endresz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've just had a look at it and where this issue comes up in the book > there's a new variable declared (like on page 153). No need to pass > the argument this way, moreover not that easy to mistype: > > for ( var j in properties ) { (function(){ > var i=j; > ... > > I can't believe no one has spotted this: http://www.apress.com/book/errata/275 > > On Dec 18, 4:53 pm, Pablo Fernandez <[email protected]> > wrote: >> That did it, although I had to add this too >> >> -- }).call(this,i); >> >> in order to pass the parameter >> >> Thanks Balazs!!! >> >> On 18 dic, 12:29, Balazs Endresz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Oops, I didn't notice it: you have to pass the `i` variable too: >> > for ( var i in properties ) { (function(i){ >> >> > That's why you need the closure at all. Without that you will get the >> > last property from all getters. >> >> > The reference of `this` will always change if you put it in an >> > additional function, doesn't matter if it's inside an instantiated >> > object. Well, you can call that either design error or feature too :) >> >> > On Dec 18, 4:18 pm, Pablo Fernandez <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> > > another thing... why inside the anonymous function 'this' refers to >> > > 'window' ?? it's totally misleading... > > > -- Fernandez, Pablo.
