1000ish items? You're really putting something through it's paces. :P
On Jan 8, 2:07 pm, "Josh Nathanson" <[email protected]> wrote: > I've run up against this event binding limit. If you have 1000 or so DOM > items to bind to event handlers, you will see the slowness, and/or get ye > olde "you have a long running script" browser alert. > > One way around it is to use event delegation, but this has its plusses and > minuses as well. In my case using inline events in this limited case worked > fine and I haven't had to revisit the issue since then. > > -- Josh > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Eric Garside > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:11 AM > To: jQuery (English) > Subject: [jQuery] Re: Correct way using Jquery > > For the sake of maintainability and reuseability, inline events are a > poor decision if you're using a robust library such as jQuery. A lot > of the jQuery source code is aimed at traversing, manipulating, and > hooking the DOM events. Using jQuery and inline events is like buying > a ferrari and hooking it up to a horse to pull it. > > Do you have an example of a large, complex page where jQuery is too > slow to list inline events? I've never even heard such an indictment > against event handling outside of the markup. > > On Jan 8, 12:26 pm, Matt Kruse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 9:17 am, Eric Garside <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > And, never, ever use inline events. > > > I disagree. I use them all the time, because it's too slow to attach > > them after page load using jQuery, especially on large, complex pages. > > > Matt Kruse
