MorningZ... It would be appreciated if you would bother to read the change logs before asking questions or making any commentary. Obviously, as John suggested, you haven't bothered to read what has been offered, so what you have likely done if a "more comprehensive change log" had been created...you would have had more opportunity to understand the situation that you could ignore.
And concerning new releases, it's not John's responsibility to make sure you understand all the code that might be affected. Any professional developer would set up a test bed to run the new releases through and check for problems in advance. > -----Original Message----- > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of MorningZ > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:44 PM > To: jQuery (English) > Subject: [jQuery] Re: @name deprecated? > > > So 5 things changed in this release? > > I was hoping for a more comprehensive change log..... i've wanted to > see "sizzle" in action on a very busy site i have jQuery running on, > but the bottom line is i was/still-am scared to death to make the > change from 1.2.6 to 1.3 because i have no idea what has changed to > look out for (for instance, Jorn's validation plugin no longer working > as someone posted)..... > > It's all good though, i'm just one person...... if you've got plenty > of feedback from posting about 5 changes, then more power to ya > > > On Jan 13, 11:34 pm, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "Why disappointingly?" > > > > > Because 1.2 to 1.3 is a big major release... and there's a few post to > > > "test test test", but there's no indication of what to test for.. > > > what's changed.... what could break.... > > > > Huh? Did you miss the beta 1 post where we outlined everything that > > could've > > broken?http://blog.jquery.com/2008/12/22/help-test-jquery-13-beta-1/ > > > > I think we outlined it there fairly well - and we've gotten some great > > feedback. > > > > --John
