Perhaps it makes most sense then to have it in the title tag. I'm not sure how much it will be used, but there will be an equal number of links to hover over as pages in our site (so, very many). We will have it gzipped though, so perhaps that is the best route?
On Jul 6, 2:02 pm, James <james.gp....@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, if you put it in the title tag, it will save on a lot of the > HTTP requests. Though it wouldn't affect bandwidth much because most > likely the json will be cached the first time, it will still kick out > requests to check if the file was modified. Are there going to be a > lot of links to hover over? Is it something that would be hovered over > often? > > Embedding the content in the page shouldn't been too bad if you have > compression (GZIP/Deflate) set on your webserver. That will save on a > lot of bandwidth. > > So it depends. I think if it's something that the visitors would use > very often, I would have it in the HTML. > > On Jul 6, 10:25 am, roryreiff <roryre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would also like to add that it would be very easy to bake in the > > description fields into the title tags...but for a sitemap of a very > > large site, I am thinking this will bloat the html to be very obese > > (We will easily have well over 5,000 pages). Any thoughts on this as > > well?
