Thanks Olivier. There's a fix described above that hasn't been
released yet. Please try my demo page in FF and let me know if you
still see the bug:

http://74.205.76.81/sorttest/index4.php

I only see it in IE, but I haven't tried YOUR demo yet, because I
can't open a RAR file. Can you please provide a ZIP?

These kinds of bugs are show-stoppers, so I'm holding my breath until
the "officials" weigh in on this!

JR



On Oct 15, 1:42 am, "Olivier Percebois-Garve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi tallvanilla
>
> I attached a demo of my bug.
> It can be reproduced in FF, just make sure you scrolled down a little, and
> then try dragging one of the blue boxes.
>
> Olivier
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:37 AM, tallvanilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > UPDATE:
>
> > Another member of this group (Olivier Percebois-Garve) just found a
> > NEW bug related to this one, so I thought I'd continue this discussion
> > with his findings.
>
> > Please refer to one of my UI.SORTABLE demo pages for what was supposed
> > to be the FIXED version of the bug discussed higher up on this page:
>
> >http://74.205.76.81/sorttest/index4.php
>
> > Unfortunately, it seems to exhibit a NEW bug, which Olivier
> > discovered. To reproduce the bug (using IE only), just resize the
> > browser window until a scrollbar appears. Then try dragging an element
> > below the fold and back upwards. On the way up (and thereafter),
> > you'll see a disconcerting distance between the mouse and the cloned
> > element, very similar to what I reported earlier. You'll also notice
> > that the greater the scroll length, the greater the distance between
> > the mouse and the cloned element.
>
> > Another show-stopper! Please help again, Jeffrey Kretz and Paul
> > Bakaus!
>
> > JR
>
> > On Oct 13, 4:55 pm, tallvanilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks Paul. Will do! In the mean time, Jeffrey's fix (commenting out
> > > line 41) seems to have done the trick.
>
> > > Also, I noticed that the currently nightly build does NOT include the
> > > problematic line, so perhaps this bug fix is already underway?
>
> > > JR
>
> > > On Oct 13, 2:11 pm, "Paul Bakaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hey guys,
>
> > > > this definitely looks like a bug. Unfortunately, our bugtracker is down
> > > > right now,
> > > > but it should be up again in the next days.
>
> > > > Could you check again next weekend or so and then fill out a new bug
> > report
> > > > and attach a demo so we can track it down? That would help me a lot.
>
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Paul
>
> > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:39 PM, tallvanilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > I see! I hate to mess with the actual plug-in, but you're right...
> > > > > that fixed it too. Here's a version with your suggested modification
> > > > > to ui.sortable.js:
>
> > > > >http://74.205.76.81/sorttest/index4.php
>
> > > > > I can't help but wonder if commenting out that line (line 41) will
> > > > > have some undesirable side-effect at some point.
>
> > > > > Which leads me to this: Where are the UI developers? Why haven't they
> > > > > chimed in by now? Isn't this the official forum for UI issues? I'm
> > > > > hesitant to use (or advocate) any plug-in with a hands-off approach
> > to
> > > > > support and development, so I hope they weigh in on this eventually.
> > > > > Meanwhile, thank you again JEFFREY for taking the time to identify
> > and
> > > > > solve this bug in their absence!
>
> > > > > JR
>
> > > > > On Oct 12, 4:51 pm, "Jeffrey Kretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Actually, I was more referring to a potential bug in the
> > ui.sortable.js
> > > > > > script.
>
> > > > > > When I commented out line 41, the behavior of the sortable acted
> > the same
> > > > > in
> > > > > > IE7 and in FF (i.e. the position was correct).
>
> > > > > > You could try pulling down the nightly build and giving that a test
> > run,
> > > > > in
> > > > > > case there are bugfixes that aren't yet released.
>
> > > > > > JK
>
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> > > > > > Behalf Of tallvanilla
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:08 PM
> > > > > > To: jQuery UI
> > > > > > Subject: [jquery-ui] Re: sortable: strange dragging behavior in IE
> > ( demo
> > > > > > included )
>
> > > > > > Thanks for taking the time, Jeffrey!
>
> > > > > > Picking up where you left off, I tried setting the containment
> > element
> > > > > > (id="sortboundary") to "position: fixed", but nothing changed:
>
> > > > > >    http://74.205.76.81/sorttest/index2.php
>
> > > > > > Maybe that isn't what you meant, so I tried setting the sortable
> > > > > > items' parent DIV (id="boxes") to "position: fixed", and it worked!
> > > > > > But only in IE(6?). It broke in every other browser:
>
> > > > > >    http://74.205.76.81/sorttest/index3.php
>
> > > > > > I'm thinking I can use the CSS underscore hack to set "_position:
> > > > > > fixed" for IE6 only. Is this the best way to overcome the bug?
>
> > > > > > If so, my only remaining question is... does IE7 require the same
> > fix
> > > > > > as IE6? I don't have IE7 (don't want to install it over IE6), so I
> > > > > > can't test this for myself. When you have a minute, can you please
> > > > > > tell me if the following version works consistently across all
> > > > > > relevant browers?:
>
> > > > > >    http://74.205.76.81/sorttest/index4.php
>
> > > > > > Thanks again for your time. I really appreciate it, and I think
> > this
> > > > > > is a vital issue for anyone using UI sortable!
>
> > > > > > JR
>
> > > > --
> > > > Paul Bakaus
> > > > UI Architect
> > > > --http://paulbakaus.comhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbakaus
>
>
>
>  jqueryui-draggables-bug.rar
> 89KViewDownload
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jQuery UI" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-ui?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to