Hi!

It's not totally obvious, of course.

Here is a blog with the complete steps taken for this to work:
http://ola-bini.blogspot.com/2006/06/getting-rubygems-to-work-with-jruby.html

Good luck!
/O

----- Original Message -----
From: Charles O Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, June 3, 2006 3:51 am
Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] Yaml update
To: jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

> How did you set up rbyaml to be used instead of the builtin yaml? 
> I'm having
> a few issues (but I always have issues getting builtins to work 
> right).
> On 6/2/06, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yep, it is now! =)
> >
> > I'm planning on doing a minor release on sunday, with all the small
> > changes done for this. One problem is the SYCK bug, which generates
> > invalid YAML.
> > Right now I've hacked the definitions to allow illegal YAML.
> >
> > /O
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Charles O Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Saturday, June 3, 2006 0:28 am
> > Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] Yaml update
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
> > > It's shaping up to be a good summer.
> > >
> > > Is the latest code in rubyforge what works for installing rails?
> > > I'd like to
> > > play with that a bit.
> > >
> > > On 6/2/06, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi again.
> > > >
> > > > These last days I've been busy reimplementing the RbYAML 
> Scanner in
> > > > Java. The first implementation is very rough and unruly, but 
> it's> > > finished enough so I can measure performance. (The 
> Scanner is the
> > > most> performance intensive parts of the YAML system).
> > > > For testing, I've taken a file called gems2.yml, which is a 
> small> > > extract from the full gemspec, and run this through the 
> Scanner a
> > > 100> times.
> > > > I've done this with C Ruby for RbYAML, and Java 1.4.2 for 
> JvYAML.> > The> results are very encouraging in themselves:
> > > > RbYAML:
> > > > D:\Project\rbyaml\test>ruby test_time_tokens.rb yaml/gems2.yml
> > > > loading a file 100 times took 5078.0 milli seconds or 5.078 
> seconds> > >
> > > > D:\Project\jruby>java -cp lib\jruby.jar org.jvyaml.ScannerImpl
> > > > d:\project\rbyaml\test\yaml\gems2.yml
> > > > Walking through the tokens for the file:
> > > > d:\project\rbyaml\test\yaml\gems2.yml took 281ms, or 0.281 
> seconds> > >
> > > > As you can see, this is almost 20 times faster, without any real
> > > > optimizing of the Java parts, and quite heavy optimizing of 
> RbYAML.> > >
> > > > But my plans really doesn't stop here. Actually, as I'll soon
> > > announce> in my blog, I intend to release JvYAML as it's own
> > > project too.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Ola Bini
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Jruby-devel mailing list
> > > > Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
> > > JRuby Developer @ jruby.sourceforge.net
> > > Application Architect @ www.ventera.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jruby-devel mailing list
> > Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
> JRuby Developer @ jruby.sourceforge.net
> Application Architect @ www.ventera.com
> 


_______________________________________________
Jruby-devel mailing list
Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel

Reply via email to