On Monday 03 July 2006 17:58, Charles O Nutter wrote:

Sourceforge isn't going to go away anytime soon, right?  I think trunk would 
be fine.  I'd consider keeping an archive copy of the CVS repository around 
anyway.

> I'd like input from the peanut gallery.
>
> FYI, for those of you using Eclipse, I would strongly recommend the
> Subversive SVN plugin over Subclipse; every time I've tried to use
> Subclipse for anything nontrivial it blows up or just behaves terribly.
> Subversive has only misbehaved once, and I haven't been able to reproduce
> it. It also by default enforces and enhances the "standard" SVN layout of
> /trunk, /branches, and /tags. I argued in vain with the Subclipse guys for
> such a feature and they didn't see its merits. So be it.
>

I'll second the recomendation for Subversive over Subclipse.  Neither is 
perfect, but Subversive seems more stable to me, and the community seems much 
better to me.

> Subversive is available from polarion.com.

Actually, I think i'ts polarion.org (though they're the same company).

David

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jruby-devel mailing list
Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel

Reply via email to