> <times> > <test><lang>beanshell</lang><time>5.308</time></test> > <test><lang>groovy</lang><time>3.081</time></test> > <test><lang>javascript</lang><time> 0.185</time></test> > <test><lang>python</lang><time>0.402</time></test> > <test><lang>ruby</lang><time>18.657</time></test> > <test><lang>java</lang><time> 0.001</time></test> > </times> > > > Good lord, what's wrong with Groovy? We're only six times slower in pure > interpreted mode (with a LOT of overhead and cruft and few > optimizations) and they're compiled to bytecode? That sounds like a > serious issue to me. Perhaps your test did not cache groovy's compile > results? That performance seems really, really bad.
To be fair to the Groovy team - on closer inspection, groovy was actually running pre-parsed interpreted! Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jruby-devel mailing list Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
