Nick Sieger wrote: > On 7/13/06, *Tim Azzopardi* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > I was thinking of doing something on unit test code coverage in > build.xml > > Obvious choices are Cobertura or Emma. I've had some (positive) > experience of both. > > Emma has partial line coverage. Cobertura has prettier reports. > Otherwise both lead the field in free java coverage tools. > > Anybody got any preferences/different opinions? > > > There's an m2 pom.xml now. Surefire almost runs all the tests > sucessfully (you'll have to comment out the <skip>true</skip> inside to > run). Certainly cobertura would (in theory) be a lot easier to set up > with m2 with the cobertura plugin? > > /Nick > Not familiar with m2 (other than basic concept) or Surefire, but it sounds like cobertura would be a more flexible choice...
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jruby-devel mailing list Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
