> > Since you've already characterized Ruby classes as method bags, why > not consider a Ruby method 1-1 correspondent to Java class from the > compiler's point of view? Local vars in the Ruby method would be > stored in a table as a field in the Java class. Creating a block > would be a matter of compiling a new method class and giving it > referential access to the containing method's local variable table. >
It could be pretty easy to have an instance that was stateless entirely and pass in the table of vars to a method on a conceptual execute(..) invocation. You're right Nick about the 1 generated Java class to 1 Ruby method... - Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jruby-devel mailing list Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
