Thomas E Enebo wrote: > On 4/24/07, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Nick Sieger wrote: >> >>> On 4/24/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Nick and I were talking on IRC and agreed that "Rails Integration" is >>>> about as boring and cumbersome a name as we could have (well, those are >>>> my words anyway). I think we should consider renaming to something >>>> catchy (and something we can type that doesn't abbreviate to "RI") >>>> >>>> >>> Well, either catchy or meaningful/indicative of purpose. Possible to have >>> both? >>> >>> >>> >>>> So, suggestions? >>>> >>>> If we really want to kill the project, we could name it R2EE... >>>> >>>> WebRails? >>>> Wrap? (just popped into my head thinking about "war" and "rails") >>>> Rawd? (Rails Application WAR Deployment) >>>> Dwarf? (Deployable WebApp Rails Framework) >>>> >>>> >>> WarRails >>> WaRails >>> Stork (wrapping your baby up and carrying it out into the world :) >>> >>> >> Wreak >> >> Ruby+Java wreaks havoc on the world of enterprise. =) >> > > REER > JEER > BEER?
-- Ola Bini (http://ola-bini.blogspot.com) JvYAML, RbYAML, JRuby and Jatha contributor System Developer, Karolinska Institutet (http://www.ki.se) OLogix Consulting (http://www.ologix.com) "Yields falsehood when quined" yields falsehood when quined. _______________________________________________ Jruby-extras-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/jruby-extras-devel
