In fact, everything will be alright if Jrun doesnt put all the classes that I ve
declared in
JSP in the main servlet function ....
so what about generating more structured JAVA files with classes declared outside the
main ?
this will not necessary be used for generating .class but it may be ?
that's it !
I believe the using of javadoc is quite cool on a group project ... but i do
understand this
is not a priority
Scott Stirling wrote:
> You can use it on the Java files generated from JRun as long as you put the
> correct javadoc tags and directives in the source.
>
> The whole issue of documenting JSPs with javadoc (or something else) is
> being addressed at the specification level. There's no answer yet, and I
> don't think it's a very high priority for them. But in any case, it's a
> known issue, but something that we'll wait for the JSP spec writer's to
> determine unless there's enough demand for us to do it sans-spec (or someone
> thinks of a cool and easy way to do it). Any ideas?
>
> Scott Stirling
> Allaire Corporation
> http://www.allaire.com/developer/jrunreferencedesk/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.egroups.com/group/jrun-interest/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/jrun_talk
or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the
body.
