Yep, it matters. That's a doc bug. In fact, those two pages have several
doc bugs. They should all be fixed in SP1. The EJB standard is ejb-jar.xml
and that's what it should read in the docs.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rhodes, Phillip C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 4:53 PM
> To: JRun-Talk
> Subject: It is "ejb-jar.xml" in sample 1a, "ejb_jar.xml" in docs?
>
>
> Wierd...
> There is a difference between what JRun documentation says
> for the name of
> the deployment descriptor file and their example of one.
>
> JRun example ejb-jar.xml file:
> C:\Applications\JRun\samples\sample1a\META-INF\ejb-jar.xml
>
> Documentation says (pg 255, Jrun dev guide):
> When you use using a descriptor file, name it ejb_jar.xml and
> store it in
> the META-INF directory of the .jar file.
>
>
> Does it matter??
>
>
>
> Phillip Rhodes
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Alcoa eCommerce
> https://www.ALCOADIRECT.COM
> 826B Two Allegheny Center Pittsburgh, PA 15212
> (412) 553-4900 (phone) (412) 553-2484 (fax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.egroups.com/group/jrun-interest/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/jrun_talk
or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the
body.
