<html><head></head><body>JSP seems like the only reasonable solution. &nbsp;JSP is far 
more scaleable than Cold Fusion and when working with a Java technology, you are 
better off keeping it all java. &nbsp;Not much of an insight, but it seems really like 
a no brainer. &nbsp;
<br>

<br>
Travis
<br>

<br>
---- Original Message ----
<br>
From: Amit Likhyani &lt;<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>>
<br>
Sent: 2001-04-23 15:00:51.0
<br>
To: JRun-Talk &lt;<a 
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>>
<br>
Subject: Cold Fusion versus JSP for calling beans
<br>

<br>

<div class="moz-text-plain" wrap="true" graphical-quote="true" style="truefont-size: 
13px; "><pre wrap="">We are currently on a project trying to decide whether to use 
Cold Fusion <br>or JSP to call our EJBs.  The client side expertise we have is in Cold 
<br>Fusion but it is my opinion as the bean developer that Cold Fusion is <br>ill 
suited to call beans in a scalable system compared to using JSP.<br><br>   Can anyone 
give me your opinion on this?  If I am wrong, please tell 
me.<br><br>Amit<br><br></pre></div>
</body></html>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to