No, Jeff, that will not help at all. One sinle Apache instance still has only one web server document root, so I'll still need one Apache instance pr. "optimized" JRun Web Application/Jrun Server (optimized by setting <web-app-name>.use-webserver-root=true) Apache is ok, but it is not the "Endlosung" you diciples want it to be for every problem.... Any other thoughts anyone? ~ Tormod ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- Tormod Hystad Senior Developer, R&D CatalystOne, Inc. - Execution excellence! <Snip> > 2. The other option is to "mark" the application as a default web > application, in contrary to the additional web application from the example > above (these two terms are defined in devapp.pdf page 72 from the JRun 3.1 > docs), by setting the <web-app-name>.use-webserver-root=true parameter in > local.properties of the server (and/or webapp.properties for the actual web > application?). This will cause the JRun connector to skip the JRun roundtrip > for static content, and lett IIS serve this content. Scott Stilring stated > that this was much faster than option 1. > > This approach has one major limitation: > - Only one can exist per "site" in IIS, since you define web server document > root pr "site" in IIS. This means only one can exist per server in JRun, > since each JRun Server needs a separate IIS site. This is not good for > development/testing purposes at least. Cost conscientious production use > neither. </Snip> <Snip> Use Apache! That may not be an option for you, but Apache handles this situation with ease. You can have a single Apache instance talking to as many JRun servers as you want. </Snip> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
