+1 for charlie, well said :) BenG. "even if you are standing still you are moving backwards"
charles arehart wrote: >Speaking only for myself (whose attitude I assume you didn't understand), >I'm talking about letting by-gones be by-gones, considering it water under >the bridge, what's past is past, etc. Let's move forward and judge based on >what 's done now as much as what's been done in the past. As I said, > >>>If future similar situations are addressed similarly, that's >>>great news for those of us remaining committed to JRun. >>> > >If the damage to anyone's faith and hope is irreparable, then so be it. I'll >just assert that as a beta tester of JRun 4 (and observer of the growth in >the standards-support of the product through 3 and 3.1), it seems that the >resources being dedicated to JRun and the improvements in the product are >such that we have much to look forward to. > >And as was asserted by later notes today, sometimes problems like this are >found to be caused by entirely unexpected situations--and sometimes not even >the fault of the vendor. But as you said in a later note, let's not debate >it. As I said, I just want to have a hopeful outlook about the future. Maybe >it's a little pollyanna, but so be it. :-) I certainly don't mean to >diminish the importance of the problem or its severity for those who >suffered it. > >/charlie > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jeff Ramin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:24 AM >>To: JRun-Talk >>Subject: Re: Difficult To Reproduce Session Issue >> >> >>???????? >> >>I don't understand this attitude. We're talking about a very serious >>bug that Macromedia has known about for close to a year now. It >>got through their testing/release process twice. They had a similar >>"we will do whatever it takes to fix this problem" response in >>November, which resulted in a patch that didn't fix the problem. >> >>I wouldn't call this a "great" response. More like feeble. >> >>If you're using JRun for development, or for an intranet where >>session affinity isn't important, then I can understand. But if you >>continue to use it in other environments, you are merely ignoring >>the issue. >> >> >>charles arehart wrote: >> >>>Wow, great way to respond to the issue. Thanks, Mike and Macromedia. >>> >>>Let's hope folks don't jump in with trite replies like "about >>> >>time", etc. It >> >>>really won't add anything meaningful to the situation. If future similar >>>situations are addressed similarly, that's great news for those of us >>>remaining committed to JRun. >>> >>>/charlie >>> > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
