Hello Scott, Does the 4.0 version support out-of-process SonicMQ ? I was part of and used the beta3 version and at that time SonicMQ was only supported in-process and JRun and SonicMQ required to be on the same machine. Any information you have would be greatly appreciated.
Also, Good Luck in the future. Scott Stirling wrote: > Hi, > > I've enjoyed working with the people on this list over the past 3 years, > since JRun 2.3. Many of your questions made me clarify my understanding > of things, helped identify bugs, and/or were accompanied by interesting > cases of how JRun is used in different contexts and applications. > > I hope everyone using JRun takes a look at JRun 4. Having been involved > with testing it from concept to completion and sometimes influencing > features, I invested more time and labor in and am more proud of JRun 4 > than any previous version. It's not just well tested, but it's also the > most developer-friendly version of JRun ever, with lots of features for > making J2EE development faster and easier than ever before. > > Anyway, I am off to continue my QA engineering career at another > company, still working with J2EE products but in the domain of human > capital management. Should be fun! > > Best regards, > > Scott Stirling > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
