> I'll be curious to hear the response. Personally, I wish it would at least > keep up with the J2EE standards, if nothing else. It's nice to have a > low-cost, supported app server out there.
Until last year we had one large customer application running on JRun, because as Drew says, it was a low-cost supported app server. But we eventually moved it to Tomcat, partly because of cost, partly because as a project Tomcat shows considerably more signs of life and is a much more mature product than when we chose JRun four years ago. We do still use JRun as well as Tomcat for development, testing and some deployment of our web platform for content/workflow/project management. But even though it has Flash front ends, we don't use any JRun-specific features at all, let alone Flex, Flash Remoting, or any other server-side components (apart from the DBMS) that aren't part of any plain vanilla J2EE server. Nick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:8:5648 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/8 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:8 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.8 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
