I agree, 1.0 sounds like a good candidate for this.

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Haile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I agree.  I think we should do this on the apache side after 0.9.0.  This
> hasn't been a huge problem and no users have complained about it, so I don't
> see a big reason to rush this change.
>
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>  Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Jun 27, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>  Just stating the obvious.  This would be a good thing to do after we move
>>> the svn repo to the incubator, i.e. do it on the Apache side.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>  Great idea.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I'd like to move from commons-logging to slf4j, primarily to avoid
>>>>> classloading issues for our users, and it also supports MDC (Mapped
>>>>> Diagnostic Context):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.slf4j.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's what prompted my investigation:
>>>>> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2696
>>>>>
>>>>> Hibernate has moved over already, and many Apache projects have done so
>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to